Impact Through Unity of Voice
EPTC protects its technical credibility and collective bargaining position through professional, coordinated engagement.
Impact Through Unity of Voice
EPTC protects its technical credibility and collective bargaining position through professional, coordinated engagement.
Coordinated Engagement
Official representations are conducted through authorised structures with a clear member mandate.
Stakeholder Relations
Relationships with government, regulators and industry are managed through a focused programme of action.
Professional Governance
A code of conduct and democratic processes support accountable, credible association leadership.
AT A GLANCE
Advocacy Milestones
Island View: a once-in-a-generation transformation opportunity
EPTC’s presentation to Minister Creecy sets out how the expired Island View lease agreements create an opportunity to balance security of energy supply with meaningful transformation. The proposal is for a carefully structured 25% participation model managed through TNPA as aggregator.
Lease history and state ownership
The original leases were signed with oil majors in 1959 for 25 years, with a final 25-year renewal option. The initial leases expired on 31 October 1984 and the renewal leases expired on 31 October 2009. At termination, buildings, features and improvements became state property without compensation, while machinery, plant and tank installations could be removed subject to restoring the ground. EPTC therefore presents Island View as a state-owned strategic asset rather than an opportunity to extend the status quo indefinitely.
S 79 directive and transformation
EPTC argues that the S 79 directive, although presented as balancing transformation and supply security, risks solidifying oil-major dominance for another 25 years. The directive allocates CEF an initial 15% capacity that may increase to 30%, but EPTC says there is no clear implementation mechanism and that TNPA is better placed to manage access for Black entrants. Access to Island View is described as the Government’s key catalyst for comprehensive transformation.
Island View infrastructure
The presentation records a leased area of 1,230,847 m², 15 tenants, 81 berths, installed berth capacity of 221 billion litres, 656 tanks, tank capacity of 1,776,846 m³ and annual throughput at IV2 of 13.5 billion litres based on 2022 data. EPTC’s position is that there is room for transformation without a negative impact on security of supply.
EPTC’s 25% proposal
EPTC proposes to establish a Pty entity to hold 25% of the Island View Precinct, with TNPA acting as aggregator of EPTC entities and shareholders. Members would hold shares based on pre-agreed criteria, while authorised but unissued shares would accommodate later entrants in line with the EPTC constitution. EPTC would define its scope of operations beyond allocated leases.
Implementation plan
EPTC calls for the S 79 directive to be halted or amended, a 12-month extension for current lease holders, a comprehensive participation plan based on the 25% allocation, an aggregator agreement with TNPA and immediate execution of Ambrose Park. The presentation notes that Ambrose Park has an approved NERSA licence, 2,500 guaranteed jobs and R10 billion in investment. EPTC also states that a 25% allocation can be implemented without disrupting the market when supported by a clear plan for the wider fuel value chain.
Why the 25% proposal is justified: the Island View precinct has substantial existing capacity, including 81 berths, 656 tanks, 1,776,846 m³ of tank capacity and annual throughput of approximately 13.5 billion litres. EPTC’s proposal uses this established infrastructure rather than interrupting current operations: a structured 25% participation model, aggregated through TNPA, can broaden access while preserving the facilities, operating relationships and reliable flow of product that underpin security of supply. The presentation’s infrastructure analysis shows room for transformation without a negative impact on supply, with implementation planned around controlled allocation, transparent governance and continued technical and safety requirements.
Ambrose Park Precinct
Ambrose Park is a 74-hectare precinct with 38 hectares of available space remaining open for new development. EPTC’s priority is to secure an equitable allocation of these undisputed land parcels for member-led strategic-stock and liquid-bulk infrastructure, while two existing bankable leases remain subject to separate legal processes and engagement with Transnet.
Resolve the disputed leases
The leases between two companies, remain at different stages of legal process. Following the 15 January 2026 meeting attended by Transnet, the Minister of Transport recommended resolving the disputes around the signed leases. The two entities await Transnet’s approach to implement that directive. EPTC supports an urgent, negotiated resolution and the finalisation of lease addenda so the sites can contribute to a coherent storage strategy.
Storage allocation and ownership
EPTC’s priority is to secure a fair allocation of the 38 hectares of undisputed space remaining available within the 74-hectare Ambrose Park precinct. The allocation should support member-led strategic-stock, storage and liquid-bulk infrastructure, with a consortium structure developed for new projects. The leases in dispute are treated separately: their bankable projects remain subject to ongoing legal and administrative processes with Transnet, which EPTC continues to support toward resolution.
A compliant EPTC entity for delivery
EPTC proposes to incorporate a compliant entity capable of contracting with Transnet and qualifying for a Terminal Operator Licence with TNPA under section 57 of the National Ports Act. That entity would be assessed on technical liquid-bulk capability, financial standing, B-BBEE compliance, environmental and legal approvals, safety, maintenance, operation and construction capacity. The proposal preserves Transnet’s role as Port Landlord under section 11 of the Ports Act, supports incorporation of Ambrose Park into the Port Limits and connects the precinct to an inclusive, infrastructure-backed allocation model. EPTC’s preferred outcome is collaborative implementation with current s79 applicants and the rapid resolution of the disputed leases impasses.
Section 79 Directive
EPTC expects the amended Section 79 framework to convert the reserved capacity for new entrants into meaningful, practical inclusion for Black traders- especially the EPTC members whose original applications were declined.
A directive shaped by exclusion
The original directive of 28 August 2025 renewed Island View leases for eleven companies while applications from individual EPTC members were declined. Following parliamentary and bilateral engagements, the supplementary directive of 12 May 2026 reserved capacity for new entrants. EPTC regards this intervention as the basis for correcting the continued exclusion of Black-owned enterprises from strategic storage infrastructure.
EPTC’s expectation
EPTC expects the amended directive to expressly formalise Black trader inclusion in storage allocation and identify EPTC’s member-owned vehicle, South African Fuels Terminals (SAFT), as the direct beneficiary of the reserved capacity. The framework should recognise the legitimate expectation created through engagements with the Minister and Transnet/TNPA, rather than reopening the allocation through a competitive public SPV process.
Direct allocation through SAFT
EPTC’s position is that the reserved capacity should be allocated directly to SAFT, the entity established by EPTC to represent the original applicants and implement the terminal operator model. SAFT is structured to accommodate future entrants through its shareholding, supporting inclusivity while preserving the purpose of the intervention. EPTC therefore calls for a legally compliant amended directive that delivers substantive Black participation, protects the integrity of the engagements to date and avoids structures that could dilute the transformation objective by enabling unintended partnerships with established market players.
Draft General Public Procurement Regulations, 2026
EPTC supports the Draft General Public Procurement Regulations, 2026 as a historic opportunity to correct structural exclusion in the liquid fuels value chain. Its submission to National Treasury calls for procurement rules that treat port-side concessions and leases of state assets as public procurement, subject them to transparent and transformative processes, and deliver meaningful participation for Black-owned energy traders.
Correcting the historical monopoly
EPTC’s submission records that the Liquid Fuels Charter’s 25% ownership and direct operational-control objective was not achieved by 2010. Regulatory silos between the Petroleum Products Act, National Ports Act and GIAMA enabled multinational oil majors to retain 100% control of Island View bulk-liquid terminal storage until 2025, entrenching a generational monopoly instead of transforming strategic state infrastructure.
Transnet as a procuring institution
EPTC submits that the Public Procurement Act No. 28 of 2024 prevails in procurement matters and that TNPA is a procuring institution under the draft regulations. Because procurement includes income-generating contracts, commercial concessions and the leasing of state assets, 25-year Island View lease renewals should be treated as public procurement subject to open, competitive and transformative bidding.
Three preferential gates
The submission supports mandatory set-asides for strategic port logistics zones for 100% Black-owned enterprises, pre-qualification requiring at least 51% direct Black equity ownership, and enforcement of the statutory transformation threshold. EPTC rejects a 15% to 30% CEF SPV allocation where public procurement policy requires meaningful direction of state spend and asset allocations to Black-owned companies.
Closing the 15% SPV loophole
EPTC identifies Transnet’s internal policy as misaligned with B-BBEE, the PFMA and the PPPFA when international bidders can establish local SPVs with only a 15% Black equity slice. The submission calls for direct ownership and voting rights that support genuine transformation, not nominal participation.
Infrastructure, recourse and five recommendations
EPTC welcomes an independent Public Procurement Tribunal with standstill protections and remedial powers to review non-compliant SOE leasing allocations. Its recommendations are: mandatory independent engineering and environmental audits with rehabilitation escrow accounts; unbundling storage into competitive lots while retaining state control of core pipeline networks; a minimum 30% direct Black equity and active operational control in primary energy concessions; extending complaint periods from 10 to 21 or 30 days; and reserving 100% of unallocated Ambrose Park as a Black Economic Transformation Zone. EPTC also highlights UIOLI enforcement, the burden of degraded sites and the need to prevent operational blackmail during lease renewals.
Procurement Tribunal
EPTC unequivocally supports an independent, expert-led Public Procurement Tribunal as an accessible and cost-effective forum for Black-owned petroleum traders and emerging enterprises. The Tribunal should intervene before procurement disputes become prolonged High Court litigation, particularly where internal appeals fail and strategic state infrastructure decisions risk entrenching generational monopolies.
Pre-emptive intervention
The Tribunal should resolve disputes before escalation to the High Court, reducing financial and logistical barriers for historically marginalised Black enterprises and providing timely interim relief where procurement decisions threaten access or commercial viability.
Standstill protections
EPTC supports the mandatory standstill period in section 55(4) of the Public Procurement Act, 2024. Institutions should not conclude contracts while a review is pending, preventing long-term rights from vesting in non-compliant incumbents before an effective remedy is available.
Expert oversight
A retired judge and procurement specialists would be better placed to assess the complex intersection of the National Ports Act, the Public Procurement Act, procedural fairness and transformation obligations than fragmented internal mechanisms.
Why the Tribunal is needed
EPTC points to the Section 79(1) Island View directive, which initially renewed incumbent leases without consulting affected Black traders; Company A’s reported biased vessel scheduling and approximately $12 million in demurrage; and the seven-year Ambrose Park access dispute, where members exhausted internal avenues despite bankable leases. Parliamentary intervention was needed before meaningful talks began, illustrating the need for an independent forum with effective remedies and no conflict where institutions may act as both competitor and aggregator.
EPTC recommendation
EPTC recommends extending the draft complaint-filing period from 10 days to at least 21 days, preferably 30 days, so affected parties can gather evidence, obtain advice and prepare a meaningful complaint. The Tribunal should provide independent dispute resolution, standstill protection, timely relief and expert enforcement of procurement compliance, with the framework aligned to equity, access and genuine economic transformation.
South African National Petroleum Company BII (B2–2026)
EPTC’s written submission dated 8 July 2026 supports the SANPC Bill’s consolidation of PetroSA, iGas and the Strategic Fuel Fund, its R5 billion phased operationalisation funding and its mandate to build a 60-day to 90-day strategic fuel reserve. EPTC argues that energy security must be delivered with direct participation by asset-backed, majority Black-owned downstream entities.
Energy sovereignty and strategic reserves
EPTC says the state cannot finance the required midstream infrastructure alone. The submission calls for direct infrastructure allocations and partnerships with established Black traders, manufacturers and logistics operators so strategic storage, port infrastructure and supply chains are not left under historically foreign-controlled monopolies.
The Doctrine of Legal Parity
EPTC highlights the disparity between the 30% direct Black ownership floor applied to upstream extraction under the MPRDA and the inadequate 9% downstream refining baseline. It calls for a mandatory minimum 25% direct Black operational equity threshold across manufacturing, processing, port limits and storage grids.
Asset-backed finance and the Section 79 SPC
EPTC proposes that the SANPC recognise and support the Section 79 Special Purpose Company developed with DBSA transaction advisers. The vehicle can manage approximately 27.8% of rationalised Island View capacity through long-term TNPA terminal agreements, secure take-or-pay offtake and bankable project finance.
Local beneficiation and partner criteria
The Bill should prioritise majority Black-owned partners with physical assets, commercial, logistical and technical competence, and local manufacturing capability. EPTC calls for local crude sourcing, biofuel blending, additive injection and downstream value addition linked to the Island View and Sapref network.
Five mandated amendments
EPTC recommends 25% direct Black operational equity; integration of the Section 79 SPC framework; open-access infrastructure reserving 10% to 15% of throughput for qualified new Black entrants; at least 25% local sourcing from 51% Black-owned importing and beneficiation houses; and fully funded rehabilitation escrow accounts before lease renewals, handovers or asset pooling. The submission also supports the Ambrose Park pipeline spur, aligned with TNPA, Transnet’s planning framework and NERSA approvals.
EPTC formally requests oral representation during the public hearings, stating that national fuel security depends on who controls the physical valves, tanks and landing grids. The Association asks the Committee to consider a framework that delivers strategic reserves, local capital retention, downstream beneficiation and genuine Black industrial participation.
Connecting black energy producers, traders and partners for an inclusive South African energy economy